Safety Guide To Children's Personal Care Products
Parent's buying guide
Printable PDF guide
Brand buying guide
Ingredients to avoid
EWG Report
Summary
Exposures add up
Children are vulnerable
Why aren't all products safe?
Methodology
Survey results
References
News release
Every day children are exposed to an average of 27 personal care product ingredients that have not been found safe for kids, according to a national survey conducted in summer 2007 by Environmental Working Group. Overall, 77% of the ingredients in 1,700 children's products reviewed have not been assessed for safety.
In July and August of 2007, EWG surveyed more than 3,300 parents to find out what shampoos, lotions, bath soaps and other personal care products their children use. Based on the specific products named by these parents, we found that children are exposed to an average of 61 different chemical ingredients every day, and that on average 27 of these ingredients have not been found safe for children by the government or the cosmetic industry's expert safety panel.
Due to gaping loopholes in federal law, cosmetics companies can put almost any ingredient they choose into their products, with no requirement to safety test. Companies can also claim that their products are gentle and natural even when they contain artificial chemical ingredients or harsh skin irritants.
Children are exposed to an average of 61 personal
care product ingredients daily, including 27 ingredients that have not been found safe for kids

Source: EWG analysis of 3,300 online survey responses on personal care product use for children from birth through age 9, coupled with EWG database of ingredients in more than 23,000 personal care products. Ingredients were compared against compendium of chemicals assessed for safety by the industry safety panel, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR 2007) and by FDA (e.g., color additives and "active" ingredients) to find those that have not been assessed for safety in children's products.
This new children's product safety guide helps parents navigate around bogus claims and find safer products with fewer ingredients linked to allergies, cancer, and other concerns for children.
Gaps in health protections leave children exposed to potentially harmful ingredients when their developing tissues and organs are sensitive to chemical damage. Our analysis of more than 1,700 children's products shows:
Exposures to harmful chemicals during childhood pose concern because children are more vulnerable to chemicals than are adults. In many ways, children are like sponges for chemicals. Children's skin is 30% thinner than an adults', on average, and can absorb greater amounts of chemicals from the skin surface. They breathe in more air (and air contaminants) relative to their weight than adults, and the blood-brain barrier that helps block chemicals from penetrating brain tissue is not fully formed until a baby reaches 6 months of age. Parents must be particularly careful to choose safe products for their children.
EWG's analysis includes a Parent's Buying Guide that gives recommendations on choosing safer products instead of the many that contain ingredients of concern for children.
Personal care product safety in the U.S. falls under the purview of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). But unlike its clear authority to regulate drugs and food additives, the FDA has no power to require that cosmetics be tested for safety before they are sold. Instead, an industry-funded panel (the Cosmetic Ingredient Review, or CIR), not a government health agency, reviews the safety of cosmetic ingredients in the U.S. Based on our survey results, they have yet to review the safety of 77% of ingredients in children's products on the market today.
Products are required under federal law to bear a prominent warning label when manufacturers have not substantiated their safety, but FDA provides industry with no guidance on what if any tests they must conduct to prove product safety, and all final safety decisions lie with individual manufacturers. As a result, our survey shows that products can contain ingredients that may pose risks to children, and can bear claims that parents can't always trust.
Health effects: Children's products commonly contain ingredients linked to allergies, nervous system problems, and other health impacts.
Children are repeatedly exposed to chemicals linked to potential health concerns through use of body care products

Source: EWG analysis of 3,300 online survey responses on personal care product use for children from birth through age 9, coupled with EWG database of ingredients in more than 23,000 personal care products. Ingredients were compared against those listed by federal and state
agencies (e.g. U.S., California, and Illinois Environmental Protection
Agencies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National
Toxicology Program), international agencies (e.g. European Chemicals
Bureau, International Agency for Research on Cancer), non-governmental
organizations (e.g. American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists, The Collaborative on Health and the Environment), and
peer-reviewed literature (e.g. Colborn 2006, Grandjean 2006), among
others, regarding potential to effect various health consequences.
See ingredients in products used by children that are ...
• known or probable carcinogens
• known or probable neurotoxic agents
• suspected hormone disruptors
• known or probable reproductive or developmental toxicants
Misleading marketing claims: Children's products commonly bear claims like gentle and natural that are at odds with harsh, synthetic ingredients in the product.
Many children's products contain potentially hazardous ingredients that contradict label claims

See products that ...
• claim to be "natural" with artificial preservatives
• are "recommended" by a doctor with one or more of 20 top ingredients of concern
• claim to be "safe" with one or more of 20 top ingredients of concern
• claim to be "gentle" with allergens, skin or eye irritants
Study Methodology
In a widely disseminated online survey, EWG researchers asked parents which body care products they had used on their children in the last week, and how often. EWG requested information for children from birth through age 9. We linked survey response fields to our Skin Deep database, an online database of more than 23,000 personal care products, which includes lists of ingredients and associated health concerns compiled from more than 50 definitive government, academic, and industry regulatory and toxicity databases. When responding to the survey, parents could select from among products already listed in the Skin Deep database, or could enter the names of products that were not yet contained in the Skin Deep product database. EWG collected survey responses for 3 weeks.
3,308 responses to the survey reported use of more than 1,200 different products by more than 450 brands. 90% of the 22,000 product type selections or answers matched a brand contained in the Skin Deep database, and 8,000 were an exact product match in Skin Deep.
To assess children's additive exposures to ingredients in the many products used in a day or over a week, EWG developed an exposure model. The model matched products listed in survey results to the product ingredient listings in our Skin Deep product database. This model relied on ingredient lists from exact product matches when available, or relied on ingredient lists from products from the brand and product type (e.g., lotion or sunscreen) listed in the survey when parents did not enter a product name that could be matched exactly. By supplementing parent-entered product data with ingredient lists from EWG's in-house personal care product database, EWG researchers estimated children's cumulative exposures to hazardous and unassessed ingredients in body care products, with model results reflecting survey responses.
Recommendations
Children's personal care products are the tip of the iceberg when it comes to government and industry failures to protect public health. An extensive body of scientific literature demonstrates that everyone in the world carries in their body hundreds if not thousands of industrial chemicals at any given moment, the result of exposures to contaminants in air, water, and food, and to ingredients in everyday consumer products.
No one understands the health implications of our exposures to complex mixtures of low doses of industrial compounds and pollutants: federal health statutes do not require companies to test products for safety before they are sold, including the law governing cosmetic safety (the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act), and the 30-year-old law governing the safety of all industrial chemicals (the Toxic Substances Control Act). As a result, nearly all personal care products, even those made especially for babies, contain ingredients that have not been assessed for safety by any accountable agency. These are particularly risky policy gaps given the many studies showing the sensitivity of children to toxic chemicals, and considering that these pollutants cross the placenta to contaminate children even before the moment of birth. A recent study conducted by EWG found an average of 200 chemicals in umbilical cord blood from 10 newborn babies [read more].
This situation is untenable. To protect the health of our children, we recommend action:
No items in basket.
Looking for a product report that we don't have in Skin Deep? Sign up to enter it into the Skin Deep database and leave product reviews.
We always want Skin Deep to be free to the public, but delivering high-quality research costs time and money. Help by donating just the cost of a bar of soap or bottle of shampoo.
Stay informed with email updates on toxics in everyday products and how they can affect your health.
It's true. EWG's researchers list the products and ingredients you should avoid in What Not to Buy.
Find out more about the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics.